Showing posts with label return. Show all posts
Showing posts with label return. Show all posts

Friday, November 4, 2011

Ahmad Tohari: The return of the people�s writer

Ika Krismantari, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta | Fri, 11/04/2011 10:02 AM

Ahmad TohariAhmad TohariIndonesian writer Ahmad Tohari is back, not with a new book but a movie.

Leaving his hideout in a secluded hamlet in Purwokerto, Central Java, Tohari returned again to Jakarta to attend a screening of Sang Penari (The Dancer) on Wednesday morning, which was inspired by his famous trilogy Ronggeng Dukuh Paruk (A Dancing Girl of Paruk Village).

But this is not the first time the epic was made into a film. In 1983, filmmaker Yazman Yazid brought the characters in the book alive onscreen with a 96-minute film titled Darah dan Mahkota Ronggeng (Blood and Crown of the Dancing Girl).

However, Tohari vowed never to watch the film for he felt disappointed that his novel, which has been praised as one of the greats of Indonesian literature, ended up a cheap pseudo-porn flick in Yazman’s hands.

Twenty-eight years later, big names in the movie industry — top producer Shanty Harman (Pasir Berbisik or Whispering Sands, The Photograph and Banyu Biru), award-winning screenwriter Salman Aristo (Ayat-Ayat Cinta or Verses of Love and Laskar Pelangi or Rainbow Troops) and talented new director Ifa Isfansyah (Garuda di Dadaku or Garuda in My Heart) — made a second attempt to reinterpret the masterpiece.

This time the maestro loved it, forcing him out of his peaceful exile in Tinggar Jaya village, 27 kilometers from Purwokerto, to celebrate the movie, which took four years to make.

“Ifa has succeeded in grasping the spirit of the novel,” the 63-year-old said, praising the work of the young director in a recent interview with The Jakarta Post.

The bespectacled man even confessed that Ifa had made him cry with scenes that exposed the mass killing of innocents by the military because of their alleged connection with communism.

“[Ifa] is braver than me,” said Tohari, who could not say much in his book about the violence of the 1960s because of oppression from the authorities when the novel was written.

Sporting a black cap and simple white shirt and black trousers, Tohari looked very humble against the crowds of celebrities and people attending the movie screening for the media in Jakarta.

His modest appearance, however, didn’t prevent him from being the star at the event. When the show was over, fans and book lovers swarmed Tohari, asking him to sign their books or take pictures with them.

“I never liked Jakarta,” he said.

“Maybe I am just too old,” he told the Post with a laugh while signing books.

Tohari once worked in Jakarta as an editor for numerous publications in the 1970s and 1980s. But, the man decided to return to his village because he felt he did not belong in the city.

“I felt alienated like an ant walking in the desert,” said the former editor of Merdeka.

It was a wise decision after all, because most of Tohari’s works were inspired by things not far from his home.

In a previous interview with the Post, he revealed that a river near his home had given birth to many ideas for books, including Ronggeng Dukuh Paruk, which has been translated into English, Japanese, Dutch, German and Chinese.

The proximity of the writer of 11 novels to nature has helped hone his skills at describing his surroundings in detail. Critics have acknowledged Tohari’s mastery in making the environment in his books come alive in readers’ imaginations.

He is also known as a writer of the poor, with many of his works telling the story of unfortunate persons living in remote villages trying to survive under the country’s social, political and economic pressures.

The book lover said his works had brought him to a cultural mission of empowering those people.

And in the same spirit, the writer is currently busy running a local magazine in his town, preserving the local Banyumasan language.

Few people speak Banyumasan, putting the language at the brink of extinction, he said.

With the spirit of promoting the local dialect, Tohari set up the magazine Ancas, meaning vision, in 2009 with 10 people.

Yet, Tohari has managed to develop the publication, completely written in Banyumasan, from a circulation of 2,000 at the beginning to 3,500 currently.

Apart from running a magazine, the man who prefers to be called Akang (brother) is also involved in activities to empower young local writers.

“I have made a commitment to support the birth of young writers surrounding me,” said Tohari, who has endorsed three short story compilations by his juniors.

He has been encouraging young authors to set up an independent publishing house so they don’t need to be dependent on big publishing companies to publish their works.

Life is quite busy for Tohari nowadays but he continues to write.

“I want to make one more novel that matches Ronggeng Dukuh Paruk [in quality],” said the writer, who said it took him four years to complete the book.

He told the Post that his upcoming book will tell the story of a child whose parents are allegedly
involved with communism.

But when will he stop writing?

“When I become used to my surroundings, that means I have lost my power [to write],” the man answered.

But, as long as political and social conditions still anger him, Tohari says he will always continue to write.

“If I am still capable of being angry seeing rampant corruption or children whose school buildings are broken, or my neighbors who cannot get to the doctor... If I still can get mad at the government, legislators, the President, that means I still have fuel [to write],” he said.

So, let’s wait for the return of this writer of the people and his new novel.

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

The return of Big Brother to Indonesia?

Yanuar Nugroho, The Jakarta Post, Manchester, UK | Wed, 03/30/2011 9:07 PM | Opinion

Advances in Internet technology have changed the way people live. For many it has brought the appealing promises of global community, democracy and openness.

Many others fear technological threats such as alienated individuals, anarchy, surveillance and repression. The House of Representatives’ proposed intelligence bill is a clear example of the latter.

The bill, if enacted into law, would give the authorities a free pass to monitor conversations and exchanges on the Internet.

Even worse, the bill would give legal justification to the National Intelligence Agency (BIN) to detain anyone suspected of threatening public security based on exchanges on social networking sites such as Twitter or Facebook.

While the very same social media have given birth of a new type of civic engagement globally, in Indonesia, in the eyes of the bill’s drafters, technology is a threat.

The bill is an anachronism not only in terms of our knowledge economy and information society, but also when considering the democratic progress the nation has made in the reform era.

What are the roots of this anachronism?

First is the inability of the state to comprehend the complexity of information and communication technology (ICT) and its consequences, intended or unintended. As an example, look at how the Communications and Information Technology Ministry imposed Internet blocks, despite their ineffectiveness, to ban access to pornography. It showed not only the naivety of the government, but also the fear and technical incompetence of government officials.

The intelligence bill indicates a similar level of technophobia. Restlessness voiced through social media is seen as a potential security problem, motivating the bill’s drafters to make people subject to arrest for status updates on social media websites.

Such a view is flawed. Freedom of expression is a civil right. The speech of citizens in any medium is an essential right that must be guaranteed by the state — be it in conventional media such as pamphlets or in contemporary media such as Twitter. The unique features of the Internet and social media cannot alone ensure this right.

For those unable to understand the intricacies of technological innovations, it is easy to feel trapped and see the problems and disadvantages technological progress brings to society, rather than acknowledging and taking advantage of its benefits.

The benefits are legion and unexpected. Facebook was used by civil society groups to mobilize support for Prita Mulyasari as well as Corruption Eradication Commission deputies Bibit S. Rianto and Chandra M. Hamzah. The Jalin Merapi civil society group used Twitter to mobilize aid when Mount Merapi erupted.

At the moment, hundreds – if not thousands — humanitarian and environmental “causes” are organized on Facebook, from supporters of the Lapindo mudflow to those who dislike local sinetron soap operas.

Twitter has been instrumental for new civil society movements such as Blood for Life (#BFL) which seeks blood donors, or Save Jakarta (#savejkt), which discuss ideas on improving life in the capital city.

These examples show how the Internet and social media can be used strategically to make social change.

Unfortunately, understanding the rich and nuanced ways that the Internet and social media has transformed our society may be beyond the state’s capacity.

Instead of proactively creating a regulatory framework or ensuring equal access to the telecommunications infrastructure that can help citizens reap the benefits of ICT, the government has used new technology for coercion.

For example, the government’s recent action forcing the makers of BlackBerrys to install Web filters and to build a local server network was interpreted by critics as an exercise of state power aimed at public surveillance.

Perhaps, as Evgeny Morozov said, we all have utopian ideas of the Internet. The very same technology that supports the Internet and social media are as much tools for authoritarian regimes to control or coerce populations as they are for “liberation”.

A quick reality check will show that technology has been used to repress as well as liberate nations.

If the intelligence bill is enacted there is a possibility that civil society activists (including trade unionists, rights activists and political demonstrators) will become targets of the government. The bill would give the authorities a blank check to violate Internet users’ privacy. It is no exaggeration to say that there is a great danger that online privacy may soon just be an illusion.

If we let this happen we will create a “surveillance society” in Indonesia. Orwell’s Big Brother, soon to be more powerful than ever, will come back, watching all of us.

George Washington once said, “Government is not reason. It is not eloquence. It is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.” The quote from America’s first president reminds us of Juvenal’s question: Who watches the watchmen?

The writer is a Hallsworth research fellow in the political economy of innovation at the University of Manchester, United Kingdom.

Thursday, December 16, 2010

President to return to Jakarta

The Jakarta Post, Jakarta | Thu, 12/16/2010 2:00 PM | National

President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono will return to Jakarta at 12 a.m. today after a two-day working visit in Semarang, Central Java.

Yudhoyono, accompanied by First Lady Ani Yudhoyono and a few Cabinet members, will depart Ahmad Yani Airport in Semarang with Garuda Airlines Flight Number GA 001.

The President is scheduled to arrive at Halim Perdanakusuma Airport in East Jakarta at 1 p.m. and he will directly go to the Presidential Palace.

Yudhoyono is set to watch the national football team play the Philippines at the 2010 AFF Cup semifinal match at Bung Karno Soccer Stadium this evening at 7 p.m..